DemoCast Net News
Exposing the challenges Islamist imperialism presents to free societies.
Jihad Exposer Draws-Out Alleged Islamist Infiltration Inside Pentagon
photo

Andrew Bostom (author of The Legacy of Jihad (Prometheus, 2005) and The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism ” (Prometheus, November, 2008) reports :

Rep. Sue Myrick (R- NC) confirms that Major Coughlin will now be retained by the DOD, and "…associated with another office program within the Office of the Secretary of Defense where he will continue to spread his message."

The Congresswoman, one of the handful of stalwart individuals on jihadism in either the House or Senate, also highlights in her statement, the seriousness of what she terms, "…the nature of the radical Islamist enemy that we face today and how they are seeking to infiltrate all elements of our society."

Rep. Myrick further lavishes deserving praise upon Major Coughlin’s thesis, "Major Coughlin’s thesis must be read by everyone responsible for ensuring the safety of America," for which we now learn he has been retained, and arguably even promoted, within the DOD.

But Congresswoman Myrick’s statement also evidences a curious if not disturbing cognitive dissonance about her expressed concern over jihadist "infiltration," when it comes to Hesham Islam.

Depty Secy England said of Hesham Islam, Hesham has wonderful friendships and relationships, and therefore he can give me extraordinarily good advice in dealing with countries and people,” England said. “I take his advice, and I listen to him all the time.

Depty Secretary England said he rarely disagrees with Islam’s guidance.

But a senior U.S. official says the life-story that Hesham Islam presented on his "resume didn't add up- and he knows it. He's voluntarily leaving the government in March."

As WND previously reported, FBI officials believe Islam is involved with the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood and is helping its front groups run "influence operations" against the U.S. government.

"He's a Muslim Brother(hood-ist)," an FBI official told WND. "He's a bad actor, and he's made other unreported nefarious contacts."

The Investigative Project's Steven Emerson comments in Family Security Matters "why the Muslim organizations Louay Safi (executive director of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Leadership Development Center) refers to are considered questionable. It is documented facts like this.

Safi's organization, ISNA, is the first organization identified on the document's last page among "A list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends," by a secret Muslim Brotherhood committee created to advance the Hamas agenda in the United States.

And what is the committee's ultimate objective? See page 21 of the same document. Remember, these aren't some wild-eyed Neocon fantasies, but the words of the committee members themselves:

The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.

That helps explain why some people raise questions about outreach and partnership efforts by the departments of Defense, Justice and Homeland Security to a group like ISNA.

2008-02-06 00:28:19 GMT
Comments (1 total)
Author:DemoCast
"Jihadists, Islamists, and "Extremists" - what's in a name?"
By Jeffrey Imm in The Counter-Terrorism Blog

Another U.S. threat assessment has been issued that refuses to identify the enemy threatening us, and instead defines the enemy only as "extremists". Today's annual threat assessment from the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) fails to use the terms "Jihad", "Jihadist", "Islamism", or "Islamist" in identifying the enemy. The question must be asked how the U.S. can meaningfully assess threats, if it can't even identify the enemy. The term "radical Islamic" (used twice) and "militant Islamic" (used once) is the only term close to "Islamist", and such terms as "radical" and "militant" have very different meanings to different people. Predominantly, when describing the enemy, the DNI annual assessment today uses the term "extremist(s)" (used 18 times) or "extremism" (used twice). In effect, the DNI views that America is fighting a war against "extremism".


This follows last week's State of the Union message where the term "extremist" was the primary definition of the enemy, with the term extremism, extremist(s) used nine times in defining the enemy (see recent columns on this by Counterterrorism Blog's Andrew Cochran and by Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, the founder and Chairman of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy). Our national leadership continues to ignore political "Islamism" as defined in the 9/11 Commission report, and refuses to make the distinction, as per Dr. Jasser, between "personal spiritual Islam from political Islam", but instead addresses threats from ambiguously defined "extremists" as its primary concern.

http://counterterrorismblog.org/2008/02/terms_matter.php
2008-02-06 00:49:55 GMT
Add to My Yahoo! RSS
Add to Technorati Favorites